Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/62299
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPimchanok Foosiri-
dc.contributor.authorKorapin Mahatumarat-
dc.contributor.authorSoontra Panmekiate-
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn University. Faculty of Dentistry-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-28T03:50:19Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-28T03:50:19Z-
dc.date.issued2018-01-
dc.identifier.citationDental Press Journal of Orthodontics. vol.23, no.1 (Jan-Feb, 2018), 9 pagesen_US
dc.identifier.issn2176-9451 (print)-
dc.identifier.issn2177-6709 (online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/62299-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To determine the relationship between symphysis dimensions and alveolar bone thickness (ABT) of the mandibular anterior teeth. Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography images of 51 patients were collected and measured. The buccal and lingual ABT of the mandibular anterior teeth was measured at 3 and 6 mm apical to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and at the root apices. The symphysis height and width were measured. The symphysis ratio was the ratio of symphysis height to symphysis width. Kendall’s tau correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationships between the variables at a 0.05 significance level. Results: The mandibular anterior teeth lingual and apical ABT positively correlated with symphysis width (p<0.05). Moreover, these thicknesses negatively correlated with the symphysis ratio (p<0.05). Symphysis widths and ratios showed higher correlation coefficients with total and buccal apical ABT, compared with lingual ABT. Buccal ABT at 3 and 6 mm apical to the CEJ was not significantly correlated with most symphysis dimensions. The mean thickness of the buccal alveolar bone at the upper root half was only 0.2-0.6 mm, which was very thin, when compared with other regions. Conclusion: For mandibular anterior teeth, the apical alveolar bone and lingual alveolar bone tended to be thicker in patients with a wide and short symphysis, compared to those with a narrow and long symphysis. Buccal alveolar bone was, in general, very thin and did not show a significant relationship with most symphysis dimensions.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDental Press Editora Ltdaen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.23.1.054-062.oar-
dc.relation.urihttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512018000100054&lng=en&tlng=en-
dc.rights© 2018 Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsen_US
dc.titleRelationship between mandibular symphysis dimensions and mandibular anterior alveolar bone thickness as assessed with cone-beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.email.authorNo information provided-
dc.email.author[email protected]-
dc.email.author[email protected]-
dc.subject.keywordCone-beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.subject.keywordIncisoren_US
dc.subject.keywordChinen_US
dc.subject.keywordMandibleen_US
dc.subject.keywordOrthodonticsen_US
dc.identifier.DOI10.1590/2177-6709.23.1.054-062.oar-
Appears in Collections:Foreign Journal Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
html_submission_65120.htmlLink to fulltext2.92 kBHTMLView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.